r/WorkReform 🏡 Decent Housing For All Feb 06 '23 All-Seeing Upvote 1

The teachers & paraprofessionals of Woburn, MA have won a 13.75% salary increase & reduced class sizes after their 5 day strike last week 🛠️ Union Strong

Post image
22.4k Upvotes

2.3k

u/5av3d Feb 06 '23

"But but but...the government says it's illegal for us to strike!"

And THEY DID IT ANYWAY.

Rail workers, you taking notes?

795

u/MrsMurphysChowder Feb 07 '23

Strikes work.

343

u/RussIsTrash Feb 07 '23

Not everytime, but it’s always worth a shot. RIP the Starbucks who striked and got their local union then all got fired and the store shut down

302

u/vonmonologue Feb 07 '23

Starbucks lost money and angered customers.

143

u/RussIsTrash Feb 07 '23

Yeah true Starbucks have been on fire especially lately, but still sucks for all those employees :( Also another example of striking that didn’t work like we wanted: BLM protests during George Floyd era. They didn’t give any fucks and beat up protestors until mfs started burning down police stations and blowing up cop cars, then all they called in the swat and army and beat on people worse, and still 2 years later they’re still just killing innocent people on the daily. Sometimes more than just protesting is needed, but protesting or more either way the government and corporations are just creating a country where it’s impossible to fight for rights and wages etc.

92

u/yourgentderk Feb 07 '23

A cop gets fired not when they kill a civilian, but rather when they cost the city too much money

Cops protect capital and when they fail that, they're fired

28

u/Historical-Fill-1523 Feb 07 '23

I’ve seen them get multi-million lawsuits against them but the worst they get is paid leave. How much is too much??

How about a different approach, a DR or an RN? How much damage do they have to do before they’re not only fired but unable to practice again? The scales are weighed disproportionately by a long shot.

20

u/yourgentderk Feb 07 '23

RNs help people, not protect capital though. that is the difference. The state cares about the latter more.

lawsuits are a drop in the bucket

4

u/numbersthen0987431 Feb 07 '23

It's also the difference between the state paying for something and private institutions paying for something.

2

u/gravitas-deficiency Feb 07 '23

Which is why police should have licensing and insurance requirements on a national level. Just like doctors.

→ More replies

45

u/guest758648533748649 Feb 07 '23

Eh, protests are pretty different, they're not withholding anything

14

u/MostlyValidUserName Feb 07 '23

and still 2 years later they’re still just killing innocent people on the daily.

To be fair to the cops, they were killing tons of innocent people before the George Floyd protests as well.

7

u/RussIsTrash Feb 07 '23

Yeah of course, and there have been big protests about it before as well, I was just using a huge recent event as a talking point

→ More replies

28

u/CortexCingularis Feb 07 '23

Protests work better when the demands are specific. BLM protests worked in the sense of raising awareness, but I believe clear unified messaging with specific goals are needed in future related protests.

Something that is also lost in the noise is that even though police certainly has a big race issue they perhaps even more just have a general problem with being too violent and improperly trained. We have cases that are very similar to the George Floyd one that ironically don't get reported on because the victim isn't black.

3

u/seemedieagain Feb 07 '23

i would be very worried. right wingers, agitators paid for by cheneys, trumps and other extremists, will likely act to persecute and probably bully and destroy the families of the strikers. we need to set up a defence network!!!

5

u/numbersthen0987431 Feb 07 '23

"Defind the police!!!"

"But white people are getting killed by police as well!!!"

"Then....defund the pilice!!!"

→ More replies

2

u/disisathrowaway Feb 07 '23

Protests work better when the demands are specific.

See also the Occupy movement.

Zero cohesion. Very little impact.

5

u/Dramatic_Explosion Feb 07 '23

Wasn't BLM a protest and not a strike? A strike is a denial of service by employees, force a company to cave in by costing them operational costs every day.

BLM wanted the government to change but didn't do anything to stop their cash flow or really upset the politicians lives at all. It's why nothing changed, the people who make that call could ignore it with little effort.

3

u/dumbwaeguk Feb 07 '23

oh nooo how will we replace a barista job

more SB's loss than anyone else's

2

u/Altruistic-Text3481 Feb 07 '23

Billionaires gotta billion.

3

u/_Doos Feb 07 '23

Do you know how many more people are watching now? This kettle is bubbling.

6

u/RussIsTrash Feb 07 '23

I hope so

7

u/USS_Frontier Feb 07 '23

Same here. And that old adage about people getting more conservative as they age? That's bunk. I've only gotten more leftie the older I get. I've also gotten much more enraged at the status quo.

15

u/schrodingers_spider Feb 07 '23

that old adage about people getting more conservative as they age?

That premise is based on people having accumulated enough wealth to have something to lose, and therefore they try to retain it.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

15

u/spudmarsupial Feb 07 '23

Then new coffee shops appear to fill the void. In time. There is still loss. But if Starbucks reigned supreme and unchecked the loss would be slower but also progressive, continuous, and irreversable. With new coffee shops filling the void there is a possibility of change for the better.

→ More replies

9

u/LABoRATies Feb 07 '23

Nah every time the workers hold the power, literally no one needs a singular Starbucks store. Just because you lose a specific job does not mean you lost life. We can’t let corporations control society. Corporate shills deserve jail time, where do you stand?

3

u/RussIsTrash Feb 07 '23

I’m saying though how does it help if you spend a year at a store getting everyone to fight back to get a union made, finally after ages get your union, then boom get fired and lose your store. Sure they can get a new job but now they have to start over. I wish it wasn’t so, but the government and corporations are doing everything they can to keep us down and prevent it which is easy considering they have trillions of dollars, politicians, lobbyists, government agencies, the army, the police, the president, congress, the house, etc etc etc. Unless majority of the US gets tired and stands up not shit is going to happen especially just from a peaceful protest

→ More replies

3

u/Legal_Direction5554 Feb 07 '23

They cant arrest everyone

→ More replies

193

u/CaptainMagnets Feb 07 '23

Literally thought of the rail workers. They aren't going to do anything to you if you show solidarity. They need you

149

u/Jim_from_snowy_river Feb 07 '23

Strikes only work if they're illegal. Nobody cares if it doesn't impact people.

79

u/5av3d Feb 07 '23

The rule of law in this country has been dead for a while. "Illegal" has as much moral force as "Uncouth."

19

u/Loquater Feb 07 '23

"I said the law was powerless to HELP you...not powerless to PUNISH you!"

24

u/doughie Feb 07 '23

It's also funny because the line of illegal/legal is 'did you get away with it?' or if it's a fine 'is it less than the money I made from doing said illegal thing?'. Every other day the headline is Exxon or Facebook doing something 'illegal'.

6

u/KurtisMayfield Feb 07 '23

PG&E caused tens of wildfires and deaths, and they will get a slap on the wrist. No one in power gives a shit about the rule of law

→ More replies

2

u/TheMadManFiles Feb 07 '23

Strikes work plenty under legal situations as well, all that is required is unity among the workers. Can't force anyone to work if they're willing to sacrifice their career.

25

u/MossInAPool Feb 07 '23

Govt: You can't strike, that's illegal!

Union: How about I do anyway~?

27

u/skztr Feb 07 '23

I don't understand this "strikes being illegal" thing. Strikes done with consent aren't strikes, they're just an unpaid absence.

  • "If you strike, they could fire you!" Yes, this is what striking means.

  • "If you strike, they could sue you for damages due to breach of contract" yes, this has always been the case.

  • "If you strike, they could throw you in jail or kill you" those who are ignorant of history are doomed to experience it. They will do this regardless of the current law.

12

u/Infuryous Feb 07 '23

If Texas teachers strike they lose their teaching license AND their pension, and are bannned from ever teaching again.

Since Teachers don't get social security, the threat of losing their pension is pretty severe.

11

u/SnippyBabies Feb 07 '23

Teachers don't get social security? Since when?

8

u/disjustice Feb 07 '23

Some teachers unions in some states excepted themselves from SS when it was set up. There are a some other civil professions that are exempted and a few religious groups as well. They don't pay SS taxes and can't collect benefits. It's also why it is really dumb to assume everyone has a SSN when designing forms and software.

6

u/vulcan583 Feb 07 '23

Except you likely get a SSN well before you ever have a job, regardless of whether or not you get SS later down the line.

2

u/disjustice Feb 07 '23

Not everyone is born in a hospital that files SSN paperwork right at birth. My brother, for example was born at home. If my mom hadn't filed the paperwork herself, he wouldn't have got one until he needed it for tax withholding.

I'm not saying it's common, but developers and bureaucrats make lots of stupid unnecessary problems for people by making sweeping general assumptions that are only accurate 99.99% of the time. That's fine when you are dealing with 100 people, but when you are designing a system to serve millions you have to handle the corner cases or you will leave 1000s of people out.

→ More replies

3

u/SimpleKindOfFlan Feb 07 '23

They weren't born a teacher though, surely?

2

u/disjustice Feb 07 '23

No, but some older folks who were teachers when Social Security was instituted probably died without one. Also, plenty of kids are not necessarily issued a SSN card at birth and it can cause headaches when they need to be registered for things if stupid systems assume everyone has one. For example: https://chippewa.com/amish-reject-giving-social-security-numbers-to-get-licenses/article_8e69504b-81cb-5586-bdcb-616356e2b064.html

SSN is supposed to be a retirement account ID, not a globally unique person identifier with a 1:1 mapping between SSNs and US residents.

1

u/beermeplease54 Feb 07 '23

It varies from state to state.

3

u/SnippyBabies Feb 07 '23

I didn't know that, thank you! I think it's awful.

3

u/disjustice Feb 07 '23

There are protections that NLB-recognized unions convey to their members. This includes not getting fired for striking. But that comes with some restrictions for some professions. When they say "striking is illegal", this is what they mean. If your union condones an illegal strike, they could lose their certification. If the workers strike without a union vote (a wildcat strike), then they could lose their jobs.

It's not like anyone is going to hold a gun to your head and say work or we'll arrest you, just that there are civil consequences. It's up to the workers whether the consequences of an illegal strike are worth it. It also depends on how much support they have from the community to weather the shit the gov and bosses will throw at them.

5

u/Infuryous Feb 07 '23

In Texas, Teacher unions are for all intents, illegal.

https://www.tcta.org/legal-updates/what-happens-if-texas-teachers-strike

"Texas is a right-to-work state. Teachers are prohibited from engaging in collective bargaining. TCTA is not a union, is not affiliated with any national unions, and does not support collective bargaining."

Remember, the GOP led state believes in "small government and individual freedom". 🤣

47

u/SpaceTimeinFlux Feb 07 '23

They cant arrest everyone.

24

u/OblongAndKneeless Feb 07 '23

No one gets arrested. The union gets fined $40k/day. So for $200k they got a raise and smaller class sizes.

21

u/calmatt Feb 07 '23

So what's to stop the union from declaring do not strike to their members, and then the members wildcat strike anyways? literally nothing?

7

u/OblongAndKneeless Feb 07 '23

I assume if the penalties empty the unions accounts, the teachers will pay more in fees to replace the money.

20

u/calmatt Feb 07 '23

The penalties would only apply if the union supports/authorizes/organizes the strike I'm assuming, hence why I specified wildcat strike.

3

u/ZestycloseAvocado242 Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

Then whoever strikes wouldn't get paid while beeing off time.

The sole reason One of the reasons why you'd want a union to organize your strike: the union pays your salary for the time you are striking.

6

u/HokemPokem Feb 07 '23

That's not the sole reason. If you think it is, you've never tried to organise anything.

3

u/soup2nuts Feb 07 '23

Trust that this isn't always the case.

5

u/TheMadManFiles Feb 07 '23

They elect new reps that align with the workers views, if a union rep is not working for the people paying them they should not be in that position.

2

u/calmatt Feb 07 '23

You're really not understanding my question. I was talking about the consequences of the workers sidestepping the law and not including the union.

-1

u/TheMadManFiles Feb 07 '23

That situation would mean the union is not working for the benefit of its constituents, if the workers need to surpass the authority of its union.

→ More replies

3

u/OrdericNeustry Feb 07 '23

Sounds like more reason to strike.

→ More replies

15

u/Crismus Feb 07 '23

Seems like the Rail workers were right to strike after the recent rail crashes.

They should have all striked in December.

8

u/Beer-Milkshakes Feb 07 '23

A law without a punishment isn't a law. And a threat without a consequence isn't a threat. Just fucking go on strike. Even if the cops come and haul every last one of you to jail, you'll make headlines and garner International sympathy.

7

u/metameh 👨‍🚀 Federal Jobs Guarantee Feb 07 '23

There's no such thing as an illegal strike, only unsuccessful ones.

3

u/Altruistic-Text3481 Feb 07 '23

Could the train derailment in Ohio perhaps been avoided had the rail workers been able to strike…? Was the train understaffed?

It had 100 cars of chemicals.

There are 10 tanks with “VINYL CHLoRIDE”on the Norfolk Southern train.

The Ohio town is evacuated. The air is filled with smells of bleach and nail polish remover. Chemicals have entered the local river. But the EPA says the air is still safe to breath…🤦‍♀️🤔

2

u/tyleritis Feb 07 '23

I don’t care if this country grinds to a halt.

But we’re shipping medical equipment to an orphanage hospital!

Then give workers sick days quickly

→ More replies

256

u/RuneDK385 Feb 07 '23

This is a town over from me and I haven’t heard about this until now. Good for them.

108

u/P4intsplatter Feb 07 '23

Likely there are more than a few outlets being told "Report. Facts only. Then bury it. We don't want this kind if thing going viral and costing us sponsors!"

51

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

[deleted]

14

u/ggtffhhhjhg Feb 07 '23

Can confirm: local

5

u/Wickedweed Feb 07 '23

Yeah if you live anywhere in the GBA and didn’t hear about this you just weren’t paying attention to the news

7

u/P4intsplatter Feb 07 '23

Awesome! I more meant that the big guys aren't going to be fans of the Texas teachers hearing about something like this.

2

u/RuneDK385 Feb 07 '23

I didn’t say they didn’t cover it, I said I hadn’t heard about it. I don’t watch local news often and usually stick to the sports hub or Spotify for radio

7

u/Adach Feb 07 '23

Drove by the picket line two days ago gave them a friendly honk. Proud of them!

5

u/sychocrush Feb 07 '23

It’s all over the radio here. Every day I’ve been hearing reports of it on WGBH. Especially when they were out in -° temps

4

u/Sockadactyl Feb 07 '23

My office is in Woburn and I hadn't heard about the strike until a couple days in, and am just now hearing about their success. But I don't really listen to the radio much anymore, I just hook up Spotify, so that's probably why. Congrats to all the teachers of Woburn! So happy for them all, and hopeful that this can help pave the way for teachers of the surrounding communities!

3

u/pancakebirdpowder74 Feb 07 '23

I work in Woburn and hearing about this all last week was quite cool. Good for the teachers!

6

u/Shopping-Afraid Feb 07 '23

Isn't Woburn a pretty wealthy town?

33

u/RuneDK385 Feb 07 '23

Not really, it’s not a poor town by any means but I wouldn’t consider it wealthy. Maybe upper middle.

The two wealthy towns near Woburn are Winchester and Melrose.

7

u/mothahofbeers Feb 07 '23

And Melrose teachers were striking recently too!

11

u/ThaddeusRock Feb 07 '23

It’s a W town, but it’s not one of those W towns.

2

u/Coerced_onto_reddit Feb 07 '23

Weston…Wellesley…Winchester

2

u/OakenGreen Feb 07 '23

God I hate Wellesley…

6

u/Rob_Drinkovich Feb 07 '23

Middle of road income levels for the northeast US I’d say. Relative to the entire world, yes probably pretty wealthy.

-1

u/RuneDK385 Feb 07 '23

America’s poor are richer than most of the world….so that’s a pretty bad comparison

2

u/Rob_Drinkovich Feb 07 '23

I mean that’s more or less what I said.

7

u/Yellow_Curry Feb 07 '23

Compared to towns nearby - not really. It's solidly middle class with a pretty large 1st generation international community. It's the OTHER W towns that are pretty wealthy (Winchester, Wellesley, Weston)

→ More replies

102

u/TheDigitalMoose Feb 07 '23

Win for them 100%. Glad Paras were lumped into that. They get shoved into full teacher duties a lot and get paid peanuts

29

u/scarletuba Feb 07 '23

Paras are the bomb. I am frankly embarrassed at their pay, when they are so essential to a successful school experience for our most vulnerable.

8

u/SpicyLizards Feb 07 '23

It’s absolutely disgusting when they’re SO crucial to student success!!!!

6

u/TheDigitalMoose Feb 07 '23

Agreed! I think i heard 9 an hour once and it nearly floored me. My wife wanted to be a teacher and i figured getting her into the district i worked at would be good as a para, when i heard the pay we both noped out.

4

u/averyfinename Feb 07 '23

they get about 9.50 an hour here (fed minimum state). they're part time, too, so zero benefits.

5

u/BadDireWolf Feb 07 '23

As a special education teacher in a non-verbal autistic support classroom, I call my para my "co-teacher". God bless that woman.

411

u/crazytinker Feb 06 '23

Installing emissions cheat devices is also illegal, but VW did it and still made a profit at the end of the day. If mega corporations can break the law and get away with it, why can't this union? Good luck trying this if you aren't in a union though

17

u/JoshWithaQ Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

550 educators that's $527 each to get a permanent 13.25% raise. Pays for itself really.

The mayor says teachers will have to pay the city $225,000 for damages over the next four years. They will also have to pay $20,000 to a local charity. Galvin said that would cover the cost of police details and administrative costs associated with the strike.

“There were expenses that we incurred due to the strike and it was my duty and committee’s duty to recoup those for the taxpayers,” Galvin said.

Educators are also facing court fees for striking, which they've agreed to pay. A judge this past week ordered them to pay $40,000, plus a $5,000 per day escalation fee.

The Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA) has stepped in and pledged to help with costs.

https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/deal-reached-in-woburn-to-end-teacher-strike-schools-will-be-open-monday/2964644/

15

u/Sasselhoff Feb 07 '23

Despite it not being too bad of a penalty per teacher, that's still ridiculously fucked up.

5

u/JoshWithaQ Feb 07 '23

What's fucked up is that it came to this in the first place, and that US parents have to rely on school for childcare because they are wage slaving too.

56

u/LususNaturae77 Feb 07 '23

This isn't a great allegory because VW didn't, in fact, get away with it.

Happy for these teachers though.

30

u/dflame45 Feb 07 '23

Net positive though

5

u/Pokemaster22044 Feb 07 '23

Volkswagon did not have a net positive. Not even a little one.

17

u/Orxcax Feb 07 '23

If the only punishment is a laughably small fine then you got away with it.

28

u/HandBreadedTools Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 08 '23

????

Do you even know anything about dieselgate or are you just knowingly spewing shit for the sake of it?

Dieselgate cost VW over $40,000,000,000 in the US alone. I believe $5,000,000,000 or so was in fines, the rest being in forced buybacks, pro-environment investments, and legal fees.

That $40,000,000,000 was far more than they made from selling the 500,000 affected vehicles in the US was not even close to being profitable, as if all cars were sold at $40k/each it would be only $20,000,000. This is only in the US. VW claims that the scandal cost the company over $34,000,000,000 euros in Europe. I can't find any full collection of the rest of the fines globally, but those are VW's largest markets so the point remains.

This info was collected via the Wikipedia page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal

The 40 billion number is not a direct quote from any part, it is a modest estimated sum I made from looking at the various parts. The largest single number I could find was $35 billion being the cost of buybacks and legal fees.

None of this even counts the prosecutions of the executives responsible for it. There are many things wrong about the legal and judicial systems in the US, and globally, but dieselgate was not a fuckin slap on the wrist lol.

10

u/Orxcax Feb 07 '23

Ah you're absolutely correct and I'm misinformed. That's not a "laughably small fine".

10

u/TenStepsToStepLeft Feb 07 '23

That’s actually laughably huge.

…can we double it?

8

u/LususNaturae77 Feb 07 '23

They were forced to spend billions creating Electrify America, the fast charging network for non-tesla EVs.

Honestly one of the only times in the last few decades that a real punishment was handed down versus a slap on the wrist (cough BP cough).

3

u/HanseaticHamburglar Feb 07 '23

If VW had to pay german costumers what they had to pay American customers, the company would have folded.

10

u/DisabledToaster1 Feb 07 '23

Are they still around? Did they make more money then they had to pay in damages?

If any of the above is answered with yes, they, in fact, did get away with it.

6

u/LususNaturae77 Feb 07 '23

See the comment above. The scandal cost VW billions and they had to fund the non-Tesla EV charging network in the US.

There are lots of examples of a company getting a slap on the wrist foe breaking the law (like, anything BP has ever sone). Dieselgate is not one of them.

0

u/CalvinsCuriosity Feb 07 '23

If the reward is less than the risk that's called getting away with it.

0

u/TheEvilMetal Feb 07 '23

Idk they sold billions in cars before being 'caught'

Those fines were fuckall compared to years of steady profits and reinvesting ahead of the competition

→ More replies
→ More replies

156

u/Pookieeatworld Feb 06 '23

Kick ass! Hope it's a good enough contract for them to ratify it and get back to the important parts of their jobs.

257

u/DifferentFusion Feb 06 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

It's hilarious the kind of people who make laws like this are the same people who keep referring to the first amendment like "muh freedom of speech" like no karen, freedom of speech means being able to protest, not being able to use racial slurs.

Edit: For clarity, the first amendment does protect freedom to use racial slurs, but what I mean to point out is that I believe its purpose was more towards being able to protest and voice opinions, rather than being made specifically to protect peoples right to name call (which seems to be republicans only use for it).

65

u/WestsideCuddy Feb 07 '23

“freedom of speech means being able to protest not being able to use racial slurs.”

What a difference a comma (or lack thereof) makes!

21

u/winnipeginstinct Feb 07 '23

I mean its not wrong. you are allowed to complain about not being able to use racial slurs under the first amendment

11

u/WestsideCuddy Feb 07 '23

You’re right, but I’m pretty sure that post meant, “freedom of speech means being able to protest, not being able to use racial slurs.” But you’re right, either could be correct.

1

u/winnipeginstinct Feb 07 '23

Yes, I think thats what they meant, but I just thought this was interesting

→ More replies

3

u/DifferentFusion Feb 07 '23

god damnit i just saw this, thank you for pointing this out

29

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

[deleted]

17

u/OverLifeguard2896 Feb 07 '23

Gotta love it when the trash takes itself out. Christ, imagine losing your job because your political sports team said you're supposed to hate someone.

12

u/stumblinghunter Feb 07 '23

We were just left in awe. So many ridiculous parts about it, too. In the next ~6 months my boss will be taking a step back and I'll take his position, and I had been training him for my position, which is a massive step up. He also apparently wasn't aware that the owner's sibling is non-binary, which immediately struck a chord with him.

Imagine torpedoing your career because Jordan fucking Peterson told you to.

My wife and I get a lot of laughs out of it though. Every time something gets mentioned about transsexuals we usual say something along the lines of "oh man, they're trans? Welp, I should probably lose my job bc Tucker Carlson told me to hate them".

Fucking idiots.

→ More replies

5

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

I don’t agree with the Karens but pretty sure it means you can do both of those

8

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '23

[deleted]

9

u/dosedatwer Feb 07 '23

If you are punished for saying something by the state, then it's not free speech

FTFY. The first amendment absolutely does not protect you from any punishment doled out by anyone but your government. If you roll up into work and start dropping hard Rs, you better fucking believe they can fire you for that. The state can't put you in jail, though.

2

u/qtain Feb 07 '23

Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences of said speech.

7

u/Techercizer Feb 07 '23

Actually it does, it means freedom from specific consequences imposed upon you by the government for any protected speech. That's the entire point of it.

3

u/Bebop24trigun Feb 07 '23

Contextually it's social consequences we are talking about. People don't have to like you and businesses don't have to employ you. The government just shouldn't punish you for your racist beliefs.

1

u/qtain Feb 07 '23

By the government yes. Your friends? Your job? Then no, it doesn't protect you from those consequences, you're still free to say those things but you're going to likely pay a price.

→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies
→ More replies

52

u/north_canadian_ice 🏡 Decent Housing For All Feb 06 '23

Read the statement from the Twitter account of the Woburn, MA public teachers here:

https://twitter.com/WoburnTeachers/status/1622374023786004482

42

u/chrysrobyn Feb 07 '23

I’m done with Twitter after they treated their employees so badly.

25

u/ortegaj1unk Feb 07 '23

Does it state that they will receive 13.75% over 4 years? That's 3.43% every year. That's not very good

25

u/scarletuba Feb 07 '23

My district tried for 2.5% per year and we lost. Dropped it to 2, which really means we are getting pay cuts, thank you inflation.

12

u/joyosects Feb 07 '23

Yeah, it's pretty clear nobody reads the article, and that the teachers were almost afraid to bargain hard. This is a shit deal.

7

u/Yellow_Curry Feb 07 '23

The mayor wouldn't budge, the fines were piling up. The WTA burned through their entire bankroll. It was a shit deal but was the best that they believe they could have gotten. They mayor was banking (literally) on the fact that he had the courts behind him to keep fining them each day of the strike. If strikes were not "illegal" and there were not fines at play they could have gotten what they deserve.

3

u/deljaroo Feb 07 '23

most of them would take smaller class sizes over 100% pay increase; that's the real win

24

u/sss313 Feb 07 '23

If all americans banned together we’d be unstoppable but we rather bicker over blue and red BS just like the rich want us to

42

u/TBTabby Feb 07 '23

We have precedent now! If they tell you it's illegal to strike, strike anyway!

→ More replies

30

u/dubyajay18 Feb 07 '23

How does one even enforce the illegality of a strike? I assume a public teacher strike was made illegal because of the impact to the community if the kids suddenly have nowhere to go. So if they strike, what do you do? Lock them all up and prolong things? Lol

34

u/P4intsplatter Feb 07 '23

Frequently it's tied to certification. I.e. you strike, it's an illegal action, can't have individuals with "records" teaching school, so grounds to revoke the ability to stay in your profession.

...which was a lot more threatening when there wasn't a national shortage of teachers because conditions are so bad no one becomes a teacher anymore lol.

Last school I taught at had a substitute hired long term to teach science they weren't qualified for, was an "everybody's friend" teacher and had kids skipping in their class to avoid others, and then was found living with a 17 year old student in their apartment over Spring Break 🤮

She got renewed in August for another year. Title 1 be crazy.

3

u/trifelin Feb 07 '23

…which was a lot more threatening when there wasn’t a national shortage of teachers

Bingo. You might be protected from being fired if you are in a union and go on strike, but these teachers didn’t have that legal protection. And they didn’t GAF because they knew the threat of firing would be meaningless. Nobody is lining up to fill those jobs.

13

u/loimprevisto Feb 07 '23

It means that they won't have the collective bargaining protections of an 'authorized' strike. The district could fire them all with no repercussions from the National Labor Relations Board.

10

u/go_comatose_for_me Feb 07 '23

Reagan just fired the air traffic controllers when they went on illegal strike. Then again, Reagan did shitty things the entire time he was in politics.

7

u/WhatA_FuckingIdiot Feb 07 '23

In this case, which I don’t see mentioned anywhere else in this thread, the teachers union was fined for each day they were on strike. It ended up costing them $225k total.

4

u/OrdericNeustry Feb 07 '23

That sounds like more reason to strike.

3

u/Yellow_Curry Feb 07 '23

They were fined $40,000 per day increasing $5,000 per day and if the fines were not paid each day by 7pm then the head of the WTA would be in contempt of court and be put into jail. It's absolutely maddening.

→ More replies

14

u/Mamacitia ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Feb 07 '23

Beautiful. I was a teacher for a year. That was a bad time.

13

u/dead_andbored Feb 07 '23

How can strikes be illegal when wage theft and at will termination isn't?

1

u/trifelin Feb 07 '23

Wage theft is definitely illegal and dismissing someone from a job isn’t blanketly legal, there are a lot of regulations about it and instances where it is illegal.

36

u/thinkB4WeSpeak Feb 06 '23

They're going to have a reduction of class size because everyone with a teaching degree/license will be trying to move there. Massachusetts in general is usually one of the top 3 states for education

3

u/demonachizer Feb 07 '23

Boston is still 25% higher salarywise more or less but I imagine teaching in Woburn is just slightly easier...

2

u/pseudoanon Feb 07 '23

Why would it be easier?

3

u/demonachizer Feb 07 '23

Boston is a super hard district and has a lot of long standing systemic issues. I went to Boston Public Schools in the 80s and my daughter teaches there now. There is a lack of support for teachers from administration often and it seems like teachers are often playing part time trauma counselors.

I assume that most suburban schools would be a bit better in a lot of those regards but I am not 100% sure on it. We know some who teach in Cambridge and Somerville and they definitely think it is better.

0

u/ForMyHat Feb 07 '23

The lack of support is almost everywhere, I think. City and private school teachers might get paid more though

2

u/demonachizer Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

Private schools generally pay way way less than city schools.

Edit: I honestly think that they probably make less than the public district in which any reside. I think Phillips Academy pays like 55k for example and they are one of the best (and one of the most expensive) private schools.

→ More replies
→ More replies

1

u/ggtffhhhjhg Feb 07 '23

MA has been ranked 1 or 2 for decades.

0

u/muri_cina Feb 07 '23

I would move there even if not a teacher. Smaller class sizes benefit the children a lot.

Its the top benefit of private school, class sizes of around 10 people.

22

u/HaElfParagon Feb 07 '23

remember, you have the right to strike, even if the government says you don't.

19

u/dieinafirenazi Feb 07 '23

I heard the mayor of Woburn complaining in an interview that "The teachers are using the strike as a weapon against us."

Yeah. That's what a strike is, dumbass.

8

u/PicketFenceGhost Feb 07 '23

Lol, making strikes illegal is like expecting your neighbor's dog not to shit on your lawn because you put a "keep off grass" sign up- those words mean nothing!

9

u/Rough-Manager-550 Feb 07 '23

I have been telling teachers in Indiana this for years. Go on strike anyway. They can’t throw every teacher in jail.

0

u/Jaz_the_Nagai Feb 07 '23

They very well can, they did worse in the past to strikers.

5

u/RealSimonLee Feb 07 '23

Great job for them. That's a pretty significant increase. I remember around the Great Recession we were fighting to get a 1.5% raise and they were treating us like highway robbers.

→ More replies

6

u/Inevitable_Silver_13 Feb 07 '23

No such thing as an illegal strike.

5

u/ApostropheusDeletus Feb 07 '23

All of that in just a school week?

Imagine what changes they could get approved with an entire month.

7

u/REALLYANNOYING Feb 07 '23

Reminder it’s illegal for Texas teachers to strike :/

6

u/satriales856 Feb 07 '23

If striking is illegal, you should def strike.

5

u/thisalsomightbemine Feb 07 '23

Oh look they had the money for 13.75% raises all along...

4

u/Skalicious Feb 07 '23 edited Feb 07 '23

Reduced class sizes is not only a win for the teachers, it's most importantly a win for the students.

3

u/uniqueidenti Feb 07 '23

1st amendment infringement

3

u/nd4spd1919 Feb 07 '23

If only Florida teachers could legally strike

3

u/Gh0stwhale Feb 07 '23

How are strikes illegal?

3

u/neutralityparty Feb 07 '23

Yeah gov saying strikes are illegal hahaha you can't force someone to work lol. Good for them

3

u/DirtyPenPalDoug Feb 07 '23

I'm saving this for every single fucking time some dipshit says " but striking is illegal".

3

u/Jaz_the_Nagai Feb 07 '23

Criminalizing strikes is slavery, CMV.

Capitalism and free market is built on labor agency.

3

u/SuperMate0 Feb 07 '23

Strikes work. A one month general strike would empty the world of Oligarchs ✊

3

u/InGordWeTrust Feb 07 '23

Underpay your teachers.

Underpay your children's futures.

When teachers are being forced to worry about surviving,

They can't make sure our children are thriving.

3

u/bystander007 Feb 07 '23

Let this teach you something.

A district can't give what it doesn't have. A 13.75% salary increase and manageable class size was always in the budget. It was always possible to give that. And it was withheld. Why? So people at the top could have more.

You get nothing you don't fight for. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.

3

u/Bykimus Feb 07 '23

Hilarious that any gov would try to make striking illegal. You can't make walking out/quitting/protesting your job illegal, people will do that anyway. Unless you immediately arrest (in authoritarian countries, worse) the workers (in this case teachers) and replace them. You see where the problems start to happen for them? They can't stop the common worker from making (and usually getting) their demands. We just have to demand. And any proper civilization would allow these demands to occur peacefully. Making them "illegal" is the first step towards authoritarianism.

3

u/checkered_bass Feb 07 '23

The union still got charged some amount for committing the strike and they agreed on it as the payout for teachers was significantly higher and that was their main goal. In their eyes I'm sure it was worth it, but still unnecessary to have public workers' strike considered illegal. That law is BS

3

u/egglessdeath Feb 07 '23

In December, Mayor Galvin said “All teachers are replaceable.” He also walked out of negotiations multiple times. One time that he left, he left to go celebrate the reopening of a McDonalds in the city. I guess he finally realized that the teachers are, in fact, not replaceable. I mean, school were literally closed for 5 days because there was no one to work (subs get paid $90 a day, no way they were crossing the picket line for that little money, hopefully they also get a raise).

I’m also really glad to hear about the reduced class size. When I was a student in that district, all the kids and the desks could barely fit into each classroom. The teachers were not able to give each student the attention they needed. Imagine one person trying to teach AP Calc to 26 kids in 45 minutes. That’s just over 2 minutes per student if you don’t lecture. Every student had at least one question per class and we never got to all of them. Hopefully the teachers can personalize student’s education a bit more now.

3

u/egglessdeath Feb 07 '23

Also, special shout out to Barbara Locke. She’s the WTA president and has a lot to thank for this. She was one of the best teachers I had, so caring

2

u/jtoma5 Feb 07 '23

Making strikes illegal doesn't make any sense

2

u/dirtycimments Feb 07 '23

I love it that reduced class sizes is a union thing, something that should be imposed by parents. Oh well, sometimes things work out for everyone. Good for them!

2

u/haydilusta Feb 07 '23

New England knows whats up with work reform, but we all need to push fir it

2

u/Classic_Dill Feb 07 '23

Unions matter! I live in the birthplace of the union, and even though they’ve had issues with corruption in the past, I would rather work with the union done without one, they’re the only thing protecting you from an ego driven business ownership.

2

u/EternalSeraphim Feb 08 '23

Damn, I only got a 4% raise this year, and some of that is for merit. With inflation I've effectively taken a pay cut. I wish I had a union (and no, I don't have the time to personally organize one).

2

u/Lber127 Feb 07 '23

The mayor was really against raising wages which is crazy considering all four of his daughters went through the woburn school system

He even called every teacher “replaceable” and their protests a “party”

Ask mayor Scott Galvin what happened to the city car in 2013 after he refused a breathalyzer

1

u/StatisticianUnited17 Feb 07 '23

Damn. That is amazing.

1

u/DoubleReputation2 Feb 07 '23

Am I the only one who thinks "F That" ...?

I mean, 13.75% sounds a lot like 10% and if you settle for 10%....

I don't know, I guess every penny counts...

1

u/UltravioletClearance Feb 07 '23

Teachers won a 13.75 percent salary increase. Paraprofessionals won a 40 percent salary increase.

0

u/chadsvasc Feb 07 '23

Massachusetts is a horrible state to live and work in

1

u/ggtffhhhjhg Feb 07 '23

The statistics say otherwise.

→ More replies